Ryan, C.; Spillane, J. P. and Bradley, J. G. (2025) The jurisdiction of adjudicators under the construction contracts act 2013: A case review. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 179(1), pp. 7-15. ISSN 1751-4304
Abstract
If adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act 2013 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act') is to be used to the degree that was anticipated prior to its implementation, it is crucial that prospective users of the legislation are aware of the authority that an adjudicator holds. This paper aims to clarify the capabilities and restrictions of Adjudicators under the Republic of Ireland's statutory adjudication legislation. As of February 2024, 11 adjudicated disputes have progressed to litigation. Thirty per cent of the issues raised during these court proceedings directly question the authority of Adjudicators. To accurately delineate the powers of an adjudicator, this study employs a review of existing judicial precedent. Disputes that were adjudicated before progressing to litigation, post 25 July 2016, are the primary source for the review. Results indicate six issues directly questioned the authority of an Adjudicator under the Act. Examples include 'Can an Adjudicator make a judgement where no formal negotiated contract exists between the parties in dispute?' and 'To what extent is the Adjudicator's decision "binding" on the parties?', among others. These queries make up the basis of this discussion. Contribution is to provide clarity for all parties involved in adjudication, regarding Adjudicator jurisdiction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adjudication; conciliation & mediation; construction; contracts & law; disputes & arbitration |
| Index terms: | implementation, adjudicator, adjudication, Ireland, litigation, dispute, legislation, mediation, construction contract, statutory adjudication, conciliation, arbitration, jurisdiction |
| Subjects: | contract type, legal systems, dispute resolution, contractual arrangements, Geography, conflict resolution, practitioner |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here