To what extent does professional service fees influence the quality of project documents?

Govender, N.; Laryea, S. and Watermeyer, R. (2025) To what extent does professional service fees influence the quality of project documents? Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 179(1), pp. 16-28. ISSN 1751-4304

Abstract

The introduction of competitive fee tendering for construction professionals in South Africa has led to increasing assertions that it caused a decline in professional service quality, including quality of project documents. However, this may not necessarily be true. The relationship between fees and professional service quality is complex and dictated by several variables, of which fees may be significant but not necessarily the overriding variable. This study investigates the key determinants of professional service quality, and how, and in what circumstances, fees specifically influence quality. A survey of 604 construction professionals, including consultants and clients, identified 20 factors influencing document quality, with the top three being fees, time, and experience. Qualitative insights from interviews with nine senior industry experts further corroborated these findings. The study reveals that while fees are a critical variable, they are not overwhelmingly more significant than time and experience in determining professional service quality. This highlights the multi-faceted nature of professional service quality, where fees interact with other factors, such as time and experience, to influence the quality of project documents. By examining these interactions, the research offers valuable insights to guide industry practices in competitive environments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost; design; professional services
Index terms: construction professional, interview, fee tendering, professional service, survey, documents, determinant, South Africa, interaction
Subjects: risk assessment, tendering, Geography, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, professional development, organization
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here