Strategy-as-practice in Irish construction professional service firms

Seriki, O. O. and Murphy, R. (2025) Strategy-as-practice in Irish construction professional service firms. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 179(1), pp. 41-49. ISSN 1751-4304

Abstract

Much has been said around the dynamics/process of competition and gaining business advantage within the construction sector; however, much less investigation has gone into the practice-based elements of firms in the construction sector, particularly high knowledge-intensive professional service firms (PSFs). The strategy-as-practice viewpoint is one of the most recent approaches to strategic management, which focuses on the people, practices and praxis elements of organisations. There is a lack of research on people within the construction industry who are the link between strategy practice (social, symbolic and material tools and processes) and praxis (how strategic activity is accomplished). These people form the critical link between organisational and extra-organisational levels, making them a critical element in strategic analysis. The realisation of strategic goals depends on these people, and for the strategy to be effective within construction organisations, it needs to be properly interpreted in the organisational context by these people. This study presents a unique strategy-as-practice lens of construction PSFs (architectural, engineering and surveying consultancies) using a sample of 27 Irish firms. The findings advance knowledge on the who (people) is involved in strategy within PSFs, what they engage in for strategising (practices) and how they achieve the same (praxis).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business; management; productivity
Index terms: construction industry, construction professional, investigation, dynamics, professional service firm, construction organization, competition, construction sector, consultancy, strategic management, strategy-as-practice, surveying, productivity, strategic analysis, praxis, strategy
Subjects: systems engineering, data collection methods, professional development, market analysis, organization, business, industry analysis, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, reflexivity
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here