Mohamed, S.; Trinh, M. T.; Mostafa, S. and Ojuola, J. (2025) Application of complexity science principles to safety leadership for improving safety participation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(1), pp. 64-84. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – Although research on the relationship between leadership and safety has progressed substantially, the effectiveness of leadership behaviors that are firmly rooted in bureaucracy on safety has been limited, especially in safety-critical organizations. Therefore, complexity science principles (CSPs) have been proposed to address the limitation of conventional leadership behaviors in improving safety participation at the workplace. This paper aims to examine the interactions of safety leadership and CSPs on the level of safety participation in oil and gas companies. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 173 questionnaire responses were gathered and analyzed using the structural equation modeling method. Findings – The results of this study showed that there are statistically significant and positive correlations between each dimension of safety leadership (i.e. empowering and engaging, modeling and reinforcing and promoting and enabling) and safety participation; and positive effects of safety leadership dimensions on safety participation are partially mediated by various CSPs. The results support that more effective safety leadership behaviors via one or more CSPs entail higher levels of safety participation. Originality/value – The findings of this study enrich our understanding of the mechanisms by which leadership behaviors enhance employees' participation in safety behaviors at the workplace. It offers a new perspective for company leaders, site managers and supervisors to develop their appropriate leadership skills and practices for promoting safety behaviors in the oil and gas industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity science principles; oil and gas industry; safety; safety leadership; safety participation |
| Index terms: | dimension, site manager, complexity, questionnaire, supervisor, safety leadership, effectiveness, interaction, methodology, modelling, safety behaviour, oil and gas, science, structural equation modelling |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, occupational health and safety management, research methods, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, health safety and environment, analytical methods, practitioner, statistical analysis, performance management, specialized education, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Education, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here