Agri, M. E.; Le, A. and Phung, Q. (2026) AI integration in architectural design and management: Professionals' perspectives. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 22(1), pp. 67-82. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping industries through increased efficiency, cost reduction, and time savings, yet its adoption in the built environment, particularly in Architectural Design Management (ADM), remains limited. This study investigates current practices, challenges, and opportunities related to AI integration in ADM. Using a qualitative approach, 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced professionals across diverse regions. While all participants were aware of AI, 83% reported using it in daily practice, primarily for design iteration, optimisation, brief compliance, parametric workflows, and creative enhancement. Key challenges identified include legal uncertainty, sector standardisation, reliability, and ethical concerns. Future opportunities were also noted, such as AI support in administrative tasks, document review, coordination, and job creation. The findings are synthesised into a SWOT-TAM framework, aligned with perceived usefulness and ease of use, offering valuable insights for guiding effective and responsible AI adoption in ADM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AI; AI integration; architectural design; built environment; design management |
| Index terms: | integration, cost reduction, qualitative approach, compliance, efficiency, time saving, coordination, built environment, architectural design, perceived usefulness, design management, artificial intelligence, interview, workflow, standardization |
| Subjects: | management, organizational analysis, economics, research methods, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology, health safety and environment, performance management, design practice, design process, artificial intelligence, time analysis, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here