Osuizugbo, I. C.; Oyeyipo, O. O.; Ojelabi, R. A. and Oshodi, O. S. (2021) Factors inhibiting corporate social responsibility initiatives among construction companies. Construction Economics and Building, 21(1), pp. 83-99. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is one of the best strategies that companies used in minimising negative societal and environmental impacts, enhancing economic development and improving social progress concurrently. However, there are many factors discouraging construction companies to implement or establish a CSR plan. Furthermore, there are few empirical studies in relation to CSR in construction, and the majority of empirical research on CSR implementation are rooted in the organisational and economic context of the developed world. Therefore, the current study seeks to investigate the factors inhibiting CSR initiatives among construction companies within the context of a developing country such as Nigeria. The study adopted a survey research method. Questionnaires were administered to a purposively selected group of managing directors, directors, other top construction professionals or management personnel involved in the operation of small, medium and large construction companies in Nigeria. A total of 196 questionnaires were administered among the sampled respondents out of which a total of 119 representing 61% were adequately filled and returned. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results revealed corruption tendencies borne from lack of transparency between companies and government, lack of CSR benefits measurement, lack of financial resources, inadequate support from top management and lack of governmental support as the top five factors inhibiting CSR initiatives among construction companies in Nigeria. In addition, the results from the study revealed that, there is no statistically significant difference in factors inhibiting CSR in construction between indigenous and expatriate and partly indigenous/partly expatriate companies. The findings provide in-depth insight of the factors inhibiting CSR programmes in construction that can help top construction professionals and management personnel in construction companies facilitate development of strategies required to mitigate the factors inhibiting CSR programmes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction companies; corporate social responsibility; inhibiting; initiatives; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | corruption, economic development, transparency, programme, strategy, personnel, survey, social progress, Nigeria, questionnaire, top management, construction company, implementation, environmental impact, statistics, construction professional, corporate social responsibility, developing country, empirical study, benefits measurement |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, economic development, health safety and environment, professional development, development economics, organization, communities and social development, environmental impact, value management, management, contractual arrangements, Geography, project controls, mathematical modelling, professional ethics, research methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Geographical Context, Information Management, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here