Lee, J. S. (2026) Visualising the impact of change orders on productivity in construction projects. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 179(2), pp. 134-142. ISSN 1751-4304
Abstract
Change orders are common in most construction projects and include indirect costs, such as cumulative disruption costs, as well as direct costs. However, proving and quantifying damages due to changes are difficult task; in particular, estimating the lost productivity is the most difficult task. Although there are several methods to calculate the lost productivity resulting from delay and/or disruption due to changes, they have limitations in proving damages. In this respect, visualisation of impacts is a feasible method of showing and analysing the impact of change orders on productivity. This paper shows a practical process that provides a novel visualisation method to analyse and quantify the impacts of change orders on project performance. Using the proposed approach, the impact of change orders on different activities could be identified and then estimated for the productivity loss. Ultimately, the paper contributes to the body of knowledge by helping construction professionals demonstrate and quantify the impact of change orders on the schedule and productivity concurrently towards a reasonable resolution in construction claims.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disputes and arbitration; planning and scheduling; productivity |
| Index terms: | indirect cost, estimating, construction professional, body of knowledge, construction claim, construction project, project performance, resolution, direct cost, change order, visualization, arbitration, dispute, damages, productivity, scheduling |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, economics, dispute resolution, management, operations research, payment, production management, conflict resolution, cost management, knowledge management, contractual condition, professional development, financial and cost management, design practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Time Control, Project Management, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here