Insights of residents' satisfaction and well-being associated with the architectural design of domestic buildings

Al-Tarazi, D.; Alkhamaiseh, M.; Sara, R.; Rice, L. and Booth, C. A. (2026) Insights of residents' satisfaction and well-being associated with the architectural design of domestic buildings. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(1), pp. 151-170. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to explore the relationship between homes' architectural design and inhabitants' satisfaction with their residence, aiming to identify elements that contribute to residents' well-being. Design/methodology/approach – Guided by a pragmatic stance, a sequential mixed-methods approach was used to collect quantitative (n = 101) and qualitative (n = 15) data. A questionnaire survey was designed to reveal linkages between the physical structure of homes and residents' well-being and satisfaction with their homes. Interview inquiries aimed to understand and provide insights into the nature of these relationships. Findings – Results demonstrate statistically significant linkages between satisfaction with the physical structure and elements of the home – security, belonging, privacy and personalization – and with aspects of physical structure – physical comfort, lighting, thermal conditions, space and spatial distribution. Thematic analysis of the qualitative study revealed six themes contributing to satisfaction with the physical structure: physical comfort, preference for high ceilings, good views, sound insulation and privacy, spatial organization and layout and provision of storage. Research limitations/implications – The findings underscore the necessity for a shift in architectural research to prioritize housing policy and design, including a reassessment of existing minimum requirements. Originality/value – Architectural design of homes can significantly influence residents' health and well-being. This became particularly evident after the pandemic, as many individuals opted to spend more time at home (e.g. remote work). However, the size and spatial qualities of houses have been declining over the past decades. This paper adds to this debate by exploring aspects of the home contributing to residents' well-being.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural design; health; home; physical structure; well-being
Index terms: health and wellbeing, insulation, thematic analysis, satisfaction, preference, housing policy, questionnaire, domestic building, linkage, architectural design, privacy, well-being, spatial distribution, interview, pandemic, qualitative study, survey, methodology, comfort
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, professional ethics, business, construction type, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, mental health and wellbeing, building materials, public policy, research methods, geographical analysis, decision-making and reasoning, project delivery, data collection methods, research design and methodology, methods and analysis
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Project Management, Governance, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here