Client and contractor experiences in framework construction agreements in South Africa

Mojela, T. W.; Laryea, S.; Zungu, Z. and Kwasafo, O. K. (2026) Client and contractor experiences in framework construction agreements in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 179(2), pp. 154-168. ISSN 1751-4304

Abstract

The global shift from traditional to collaborative procurement and contracting has increased the use of framework construction agreements (FCAs). This study sought to identify reasons clients opt for the use of these agreements and analyse the experiences of clients and contractors using framework agreements for construction projects. Questionnaire data from 19 respondents representing a 63% response rate in five client organisations and four contractor organisations were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings indicate that both parties have positive experiences with FCAs, citing collaboration, efficiency, and cost savings as some of the mutual reasons. Clients prioritise FCAs for enhanced efficiency and effectiveness. They use them due to their ability to enhance successful project outcomes, facilitate rapid project planning and implementation, and promote collaboration. However, the main challenge for clients revolves around understanding how an FCA is set up and utilised. Others include fairness concerns and jurisdictional alignment. The contractors, on the other hand, mainly struggle with insufficient commercial knowledge of FCAs, highlighting the need for them to develop strong commercial expertise to engage profitably in setting up and utilising these agreements. Clients and contractors should address these challenges to improve the mutual experience for the parties.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; client; collaborative procurement; contractor; framework agreement; procurement
Index terms: statistics, implementation, project outcome, project planning, construction project, built environment, questionnaire, fairness, framework agreement, cost saving, client organization, efficiency, contractor organization, agreements, effectiveness, South Africa, collaboration
Subjects: leadership, management, Geography, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, control systems, data collection methods, client relations, project completion, performance management, economics, infrastructure and transport systems, organization, contract formation, production management
Topics: Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here