Elkhayat, Y.; Moran, P.; Barrett, S.; Barry, P. and Goggins, J. (2026) Developing a methodology with a tool for calculating and reducing the upfront carbon emissions of buildings: Ireland as a case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 22(1), pp. 168-187. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Upfront carbon emissions of buildings encompass all greenhouse gas emissions linked to building materials extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and installation processes. Many countries face barriers in calculating and reducing the upfront carbon emissions of buildings during the design stage due to unreliable materials embodied carbon (EC) data, inconsistent methods, and tool complexity. Therefore, the current study aims to develop a national adaptable methodology with a simple tool for calculating and reducing buildings' upfront carbon emissions based on a reliable regional EC dataset. To validate the developed methodology and tool, a group of architecture firms in Ireland used it to calculate and reduce the upfront carbon emissions of their projects. Fourteen buildings representing six typologies were evaluated, and on average, the results were 436 and 648 kgCO2e/m2 for residential and non-residential buildings, respectively. The calculation method and tool have been validated since the upfront carbon emissions values align with the averages of buildings in Europe. The reduction methodology was developed using the materials' substitution strategy to replace in-situ concrete, steel, insulation, and window frames with lower-EC alternatives. The substitutions reduced the upfront carbon emissions of the residential and non-residential case studies by 21% and 23.8% on average, achieving the Irish government's 2030 Climate Action Plan. The future development of the reduction methodology can go further by considering more key materials.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building LCA; carbon calculation tool; carbon reduction; material substitution; upfront carbon emissions |
| Index terms: | carbon reduction, face, insulation, complexity, carbon emission, design stage, non-residential building, Ireland, embodied carbon, Europe, window, greenhouse gas emission, building material, dataset, in-situ, methodology, case study, strategy |
| Subjects: | data management, physical geography and landforms, data collection methods, architectural elements, research methods, building materials, Geography, management, systems engineering, psychology, environmental impact, environmental health, climate science, professional practice, building construction, construction type |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here