Duodu, B.; Nduro, E. and Rowlinson, S. (2026) Enhancing construction contracting firm performance through external knowledge sourcing: Is innovation the "black box"? Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(1), pp. 193-212. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of two bundles of external knowledge on the business performance of construction contracting firms and the role of innovation as a mediator in the association between external knowledge and business performance. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from a sample of construction contracting firms in Hong Kong using a quantitative questionnaire survey. The hypotheses of the study were tested using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Findings – The results show that knowledge from market sources directly affects business performance, but knowledge from institutional sources does not have a significant direct effect. Innovation in construction contracting firms mediates the interlinkage between institutional sources and business performance. Originality/value – This study contributes to the extant literature by being among the first to explore the relevance of two bundles of external knowledge for innovation and business performance in construction contracting firms. It shows which bundle of knowledge firms must focus on to achieve their innovation and business performance objectives and, therefore, has implications for their knowledge search strategy in their attempt to enhance performance outcomes through innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firms; external knowledge; innovation; institutional sources; market sources; performance |
| Index terms: | construction firm, partial least square, questionnaire, construction contracting firm, business performance, survey, methodology, direct effect, Hong Kong, structural equation modelling, strategy, performance outcome, mediator |
| Subjects: | value management, performance measurement, data collection methods, research methods, Geography, management, dispute resolution, organization, statistical analysis, factor and component analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here