Moyo, T.; Raliile, M.; Edwards, D. J. and Chigara, B. (2026) Construct validation for technical sustainability as the fourth pillar for achieving sustainable construction: A case for Zimbabwe. Construction Innovation, 26(9), pp. 233-263. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – Technological obsolescence and weak construction-related institutional frameworks within Zimbabwe's construction sector underscore the need to develop and implement a sustainable construction model that explicitly integrates technical sustainability. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by developing and validating a stochastic sustainable construction model by delineating a fourth pillar of "technical", to the three existing pillars of sustainability (namely, social, environmental and economic). Design/methodology/approach – Model development was premised upon complexity and sustainability theories. Primary data on the relevance of sustainability indicators across the four pillars was collected through an online questionnaire survey completed by construction professionals from consultancy firms, construction companies, government bodies and academic institutions. Construct validity was demonstrated using convergent and discriminant validity. Findings – Results revealed that technical sustainability (which included: policy support for decent working conditions; implementation of efficient technological advances; adequate sustainable construction practices; and adequate construction project technical management) constitutes a fourth pillar of sustainability for achieving sustainable construction. Cumulatively, the findings confirm the utility of complexity theory for interrogating sustainable construction. A major recommendation made is to allocate incentives for realising green technology and modern construction methods adoption. While the study's findings are limited by content and context, the approach can be replicated in various countries. Originality/value – This study validates technical sustainability as a fourth pillar for achieving sustainable construction in a developing country like Zimbabwe. In addition, the study exposes the contribution of sustainable indicators to the various pillars of sustainability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construct validity; sustainable construction; sustainable construction indicator; Zimbabwe |
| Index terms: | implementation, validity, construction professional, construction method, Zimbabwe, developing country, construction company, sustainable construction, questionnaire, construction sector, survey, construction project, methodology, validation, working conditions, obsolescence, sustainability indicator, model development, consultancy, complexity, sustainable construction practice |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, Geography, research methods, production management, analytical methods, sustainable construction, evaluation and assessment methods, contractual arrangements, development economics, employment law, professional development, data collection methods, sustainability assessment, industry analysis, building construction, asset management, organization |
| Topics: | Project Management, International Construction, Procurement, Information Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here