Comerford, P.; Kinnane, O.; O'Hegarty, R. and Crowe, P. (2026) Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: New assessment framework. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 467-487. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Plans to decarbonise residential construction in many countries focus mainly on reducing the operational energy of dwellings and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, rather than the full life-cycle emissions of construction. Although there is a growing body of data that measures the embodied carbon (EC) of different housing types, existing studies have mainly assessed materials within the building envelope. Where siteworks and infrastructure are included, there is often a lack of clarity regarding the physical scope of site boundaries due to the various methodologies used, making it difficult to compare results across studies. This gap is addressed by research underpinning a new framework that provides precise definitions of the physical scope of EC assessment at a range of scales from building to neighbourhood, allowing siteworks to be included in the EC calculations of new developments. A case study housing development in Ireland illustrates the framework. The results show that siteworks comprising hard landscaping and infrastructure add an additional 32% to the total EC for life-cycle stages A1–A5 of low-rise housing typologies, demonstrating the importance of the framework. By integrating siteworks into life-cycle assessment (LCA) calculations, the research highlights the relationships between building typology, residential density and EC emissions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | embodied carbon; housing; infrastructure; life-cycle assessment; neighbourhood; planning; residential development; siteworks; sustainable urban development; urban morphology |
| Index terms: | housing development, methodology, building envelope, residential development, greenhouse gas, case study, urban morphology, embodied carbon, density, building typology, sustainable urban development, Ireland, residential construction, housing, boundaries |
| Subjects: | construction integration, Geography, sustainability and resilience, research methods, architectural elements, property law, economic development, data collection methods, urban form and morphology, construction type, analytical methods, climate science, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here