Jafar, S. S. and Mohammed, S. R. (2026) Identifying the significant factors influencing bridge maintenance prioritization in Iraq. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 16(3), pp. 484-502. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – Bridge asset managers face challenges in maintaining the efficiency of bridge networks under limited budgets. Although several models have been developed around the world to prioritize bridges for maintenance, there are still limited studies investigating the factors influencing bridge maintenance prioritization, especially in developing countries. This study aims to address this gap by identifying the factors influencing bridge maintenance prioritization in Iraq. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review was conducted to identify the factors. Six experts from the Iraqi Public Authority for Roads and Bridges (PARB) refined the list to 32 factors via semi-structured interviews. A questionnaire survey was then carried out. In total, 46 responses were received and analyzed using both descriptive and inferential methods. Descriptive analysis involved computing the mean values, while the inferential analysis employed the one-sample t-test and one-way ANOVA. Findings – According to the survey findings, the top five significant factors influencing bridge maintenance prioritization in Iraq were bridge condition, traffic volume, human-related risk, bridge location, and maintenance cost. In addition, the result indicated that all experts from different parties (i.e. clients, consultants and contractors) had a good consensus on the relative importance of all priority factors. Originality/value – Literature shows a lack of studies investigating the factors influencing bridge maintenance prioritization (especially in Iraq). This study represents the first attempt to fill this gap by identifying technical, functional, socioeconomic and environmental factors influencing prioritization in Iraq. This study extends the existing body of knowledge and practice and supports transportation departments in making informed investment decisions under limited budgets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bridge asset management; bridge maintenance; maintenance planning; prioritization factors; statistical analysis; survey |
| Index terms: | body of knowledge, public authority, developing country, face, efficiency, computing, statistical analysis, questionnaire, manager, maintenance cost, environmental factor, relative importance, asset management, methodology, survey, interview, literature review, investment decision |
| Subjects: | practitioner, computing systems, psychology, administrative law, economic analysis, risk assessment, environmental science, knowledge management, data collection methods, development economics, performance management, data analysis and analytics, financial management, asset management, research methods, data science |
| Topics: | Information Management, Quality Management, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here