Ogundare, I.; Kassa, R.; Maali, O.; Lines, B.; Smithwick, J. and Sullivan, K. (2026) Skillsets differences among field leaders in the US sheet metal and air conditioning trades. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 16(3), pp. 561-577. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – The construction industry faces a persistent labor shortage that undermines productivity and project performance. As traditional metrics like schedule, budget, and quality depend heavily on workforce capabilities, addressing talent gaps is critical. This study aims to identify the distinguishing skillsets of top-performing specialty field leaders (FLs) in the United States and explore how performance evaluation can support workforce development and retention strategies. Design/methodology/approach – Supervisor-rated performance data were collected for 80 specialty FLs across 22 performance indicators grouped into four competency areas. Principal Component Analysis was used to create a composite performance index, which provided a systematic cutoff for classifying FLs as top or average performers. Independent t-tests were then conducted to assess statistically significant differences between the two groups across each performance factor. Findings – Top-performing FLs significantly outperformed their peers in 17 of 22 competencies across all four areas: technical skills, leadership and communication, adaptability and overall job performance. These findings highlight critical performance drivers for targeted workforce development in specialty contracting. Practical implications – Construction firms can use the findings to implement structured performance evaluation tools and individualized training plans that enhance workforce capabilities and project delivery. The composite index provides a scalable method for benchmarking performance and addressing skill gaps among field leaders. Originality/value – This study introduces a composite performance index tailored to specialty FLs and applies it to distinguish high performers. It advances construction workforce literature by linking field-level performance with broader labor challenges, providing a framework for training, succession planning and retention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | field-leaders; performance evaluation; site-supervisors; skillsets; specialty trades; talent development; talent retention |
| Index terms: | air conditioning, supervisor, United States, performance evaluation, project performance, metal, workforce development, succession planning, construction industry, face, adaptability, benchmarking, construction firm, project delivery, composite, strategy, technical skill, methodology, productivity, performance indicator, labour shortage, retention, principal component analysis |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, economics, traditional and composite building materials, materials science, psychology, practitioner, professional development, statistical analysis, organization, user focus, environmental engineering, research methods, industry analysis, management, Geography, performance measurement, project delivery, performance management |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Human Resources, Sustainability, Procurement, Education, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Quality Management, Information Management, Geographical Context, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here