Sospeter, N. G.; Awuzie, B. O. and Ngowi, A. (2026) Restoring labour dignity: Analysing decent work improvement strategies in tanzania's circular construction supply chains. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 16(3), pp. 578-596. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – This study addresses the limited understanding of strategies for enhancing decent work quality (DWQ) within circular construction supply chains (CCSCs), particularly in developing country contexts. Focusing on Tanzania, it examines the challenges of informality and poor working conditions in CCSCs and contributes by identifying and categorizing key strategies for improving DWQ. The study is framed by labour process theory, providing a lens to analyse power dynamics and institutional structures that shape labour outcomes in a developing economy. Design/methodology/approach – The study adopted a survey research design, collecting data from 207 unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled construction workers across multiple sites in Tanzania through self-administered questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to validate the measurement structure and ensure that the observed variables reliably represented the underlying constructs. Findings – The study's results reveal that strategies for enhancing DWQ in Tanzanian CCSCs cluster around three components: Institutional and Labour Governance Strategies, Community and Policy-Driven Interventions and Workplace Environment and Safety Practices. These components encompass measures such as technology-enabled labour inspection, strengthened social dialogue, pro-labour policies, participatory planning, provision of protective equipment, compliance with working hours and improved workplace conditions. These components form a multi-scalar framework that delineates the interconnected roles of state regulation, community inclusion and shop-floor practices in restoring labour dignity. The findings underscore that in a developing context, robust governance is the foundational pillar without which community and workplace interventions are less effective. Research limitations/implications – From a research perspective, the study advocates the use of multi-scalar and integrative approaches that examine the impact of interplay between governance, community interventions and workplace practices within CCSCs on DWQ. Future research should employ mixed-methods and longitudinal designs to capture causal dynamics and temporal shifts in decent work outcomes. Comparative studies across regions are essential to understanding how digital inspection tools and inclusive procurement models function within diverse institutional and labour market contexts. Additionally, exploring the climate–labour nexus could reveal how employment-intensive, circular infrastructure programs simultaneously advance environmental sustainability, urban resilience and decent work. Practical implications – The results offer evidence-based insights to guide policymakers and industry stakeholders in formulating frameworks that advance DWQ and promote sustainability in Tanzania's construction sector and comparable contexts across Sub-Saharan Africa. Originality/value – This study is among the first to place decent work at the centre of circular economy transitions in developing economies, providing novel insights into improving work quality within CCSCs. It moves beyond a technical view of circularity to present a politically and institutionally nuanced understanding, offering a targeted framework for labour dignity in CCSCs that accounts for the high informality and regulatory gaps characteristic of developing countries
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; construction supply chain; decent work quality; factor analysis; strategies and Tanzania |
| Index terms: | workplace environment, governance, circularity, evidence, urban resilience, protective equipment, working hours, research design, comparative study, survey, regulation, methodology, factor analysis, employment, strategy, developing economy, construction worker, Sub-Saharan Africa, Tanzania, program, circular economy, confirmatory factor analysis, developing country, construction supply chain, compliance, labour market, dynamics, environmental sustainability, developing country context, working conditions, construction sector, questionnaire, inspection |
| Subjects: | management, industry analysis, sustainable materials, Geography, sustainable design, evaluation and assessment methods, sustainability and resilience, quality assurance, research methods, economic development, data collection methods, development economics, research design and methodology, software systems, physical geography and landforms, sociology, employment law, construction logistics, occupational health and safety management, business, economics, practitioner, health safety and environment, socioeconomic context, statistical analysis, political science, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Governance, Quality Management, International Construction, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here