Ding, L.; Wang, T. and Chan, P. W. (2026) Digital platforms for circular construction: Incumbent supply chain actors' perceptions of emerging intermediaries in the Dutch context. Construction Management and Economics, 44(8), pp. 593-612. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Digital platforms are increasingly promoted as key enablers of circular construction, yet empirical insight remains limited into incumbent supply chain actors' needs and experiences with these platforms as emerging intermediaries. Addressing this gap, this study examines the perceptions of supply chain actors operating within the Dutch construction sector, drawing on 18 semi-structured interviews, a focus group workshop, and observations from two national circular digital transition programs. Building on existing research, digital platforms are conceptualized not merely as technical infrastructures, but as intermediaries embedded within existing supply chain practices and coordination arrangements, forming triadic relationships between supply and demand actors. Accordingly, the analysis is structured according to different intermediation needs across material flows, support flows, and systemic coordination. The findings indicate that digital platforms are widely expected to enhance supply-demand visibility and matchmaking, support compliance with evolving circularity-related KPIs, and facilitate cross-sector coordination. However, their adoption and perceived value vary substantially across actors, product types, and supply chain configurations, with persistent challenges in coordinating material logistics, accounting for environmental and social externalities and managing evolving platform power dynamics. The study contributes to construction management and circular supply chain research by advancing the concept of intermediaries for examining how digital platforms shape circular transitions. It further highlights the importance of more context-sensitive platform design and governance arrangements that respond to diverse intermediation needs and underlying platform dynamics in the transition to circular construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; construction industry; digital platforms; intermediaries; supply chain; systemic transitions |
| Index terms: | intermediary, interview, drawing, circularity, supply and demand, governance, focus group, accounting, construction sector, coordination, dynamics, configuration, workshop, construction industry, compliance, circular economy, platform, program |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, business, construction type, health safety and environment, systems engineering, management, industry analysis, sustainable materials, sustainable design, digital design, data collection methods, market analysis, software systems, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here