Badi, S.; Suliman, A.; Torku, A. and Yasin, K. (2026) How does AI adoption in construction organisations influence employee well-being? The mediating role of job crafting. Construction Management and Economics, 44(8), pp. 613-638. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
This study examines the impact of organizational AI adoption on project managers' job crafting behaviours and subsequent effects on work engagement and emotional exhaustion in construction organizations. Drawing on the Job Crafting framework and the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model, we operationalized AI-related structural and social job resources, challenging job demands, and reduction of hindering demands. Data were collected from 393 project managers and analysed using structural equation modelling. Results indicate that AI adoption significantly enhances all dimensions of job crafting, with the strongest effects on structural and challenging job resources. Social job resources and challenging demands positively influenced work engagement, whereas structural resources did not, and reductions in hindering demands unexpectedly decreased engagement while increasing exhaustion. These findings reveal the dual-edged nature of AI in construction project management, highlighting the importance of combining technological adoption with social support and skill development. The study contributes to theory by integrating AI into job crafting and JD-R frameworks and offers practical guidance for enhancing employee well-being in AI-enabled construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence adoption; emotional exhaustion; job crafting; job demands–resources (jd-r) model; work engagement |
| Index terms: | skills development, dimension, construction project management, job demand, construction project, construction organization, well-being, drawing, artificial intelligence, structural equation modelling, project manager |
| Subjects: | management, artificial intelligence, technical documentation, project management theory and practice, profession, personnel development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, mental health and wellbeing, production management, statistical analysis, organization |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here