Silwal, A.; Rouhanizadeh, B.; Safapour, E. and Ricks, M. (2026) Sustainable transportation infrastructure: Comparative analysis and a comprehensive decision-support tool. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 16(3), pp. 616-636. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – There are two critical gaps in the existing knowledge: a measurable set of sustainability metrics and a comprehensive decision support tool for evaluating transportation projects. This study aims to address these gaps. Design/methodology/approach – Transportation sustainability factors were identified and used to develop a survey administered to a purposive sample of 50 transportation experts from Asia, the United States (US), Europe, and Africa. Survey responses were analyzed using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to estimate metric- and factor-level weights from global, US, and non-US perspectives. These weights were then implemented to construct a Sustainability-driven Prioritization Index (SPI), which was developed based on global stakeholder input to ensure worldwide applicability. The SPI was subsequently validated through a case study in states bordering the Gulf of Mexico. Findings – The findings show that globally, livable public spaces and amenities, transportation costs, and active citizen involvement in transportation planning were found to be the most important factors for environment, economy, and society, respectively, while road fatality intensity and integrated plan of all significant impacts led in operation and safety. This approach was among the first to combine stakeholder feedback and global adaptability for assessing and ranking transportation project sustainability. Originality/value – The SPI is a quantitative scoring tool that assigns weighted values to 55 sustainability factors across five metrics. Transportation planners input project-specific data, and the tool could calculate a comprehensive sustainability score using stakeholder-informed weights. This enables objective comparison and ranking of multiple transportation projects, helping policymakers prioritize investments that maximize sustainability outcomes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical hierarchy process; critical infrastructure; development; infrastructure management; sustainability; transport |
| Index terms: | fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, transportation infrastructure, analytical hierarchy process, United States, Africa, society, adaptability, transportation planning, public space, estimate, critical infrastructure, decision support, survey, methodology, Asia, planner, case study, transportation project, Mexico, infrastructure management, comparative analysis, Europe |
| Subjects: | regions and continents, profession, urban design and public space, decision-making and optimization, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, user focus, infrastructure engineering, Geography, transportation engineering, data analysis and analytics, physical geography and landforms, financial and cost management, decision analysis, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Design Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here