Ramalingam Rethnam, O. and Thomas, A. (2026) A physics-informed deep learning-based urban building thermal comfort modeling and prediction framework for identifying thermally vulnerable building stock. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(2), pp. 622-648. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – Due to the increasing frequency of extreme weather and densifying urban landscapes, residences are susceptible to heat-related discomfort, especially those in a naturally ventilated built environment in tropical climates. Indoor thermal comfort is thus paramount to building sustainability and improving occupants' health and well-being. However, to assess indoor thermal comfort considering the urban context, it is conventional to use questionnaire surveys and monitoring units, which are both case-centric and time-intensive. This study presents a dynamic computational thermal comfort modeling framework that can determine indoor thermal comfort at an urban scale to bridge this gap. Design/methodology/approach – The framework culminates in developing a deep learning model for predicting the accurate hourly indoor temperature of urban building stock by the coupling urban scale capabilities of environment modeling with single-building dynamic thermal simulations. Findings – Using the framework, a surrogate model is created and verified for Dharavi, India's informal urban settlement. The results indicated that the developed surrogate model could predict the building's indoor temperature in several complex new urban scenarios with different building orientations, layouts, building-to-building distances and surrounding building heights, using five different random urban representative scenarios as the training set. The prediction accuracy was reliable, as evidenced by the mean bias error (MBE) and coefficient of (CV) root mean squared error (MSE) falling between 0 and 5%. The findings also showed that if the urban context is ignored, estimates of annual discomfort hours may be inaccurate by as much as 70%. Social implications – The developed computational framework could help regulators and policymakers engage in more informed and quantitative decision-making and direct efforts to enhance the thermal comfort of low-income dwellings and informal settlements. Originality/value – Up to this point, majority of literature that has been presented has concentrated on building a body of knowledge about urban-based modeling from an energy management standpoint. In contrast, this study suggests a dynamic computational thermal comfort modeling framework that takes into account the urban context of the neighborhood while examining the indoor thermal comfort of the residential building stock.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; energyplus; machine learning; simulation; temperature prediction; thermal comfort; urban building thermal comfort modeling |
| Index terms: | built environment, energy management, questionnaire, residential building, bias, income, health and wellbeing, body of knowledge, informal settlement, estimate, discomfort, machine learning, coupling, survey, thermal comfort, modelling, building sustainability, methodology, accuracy, weather, deep learning, building height, energyplus, building stock, monitoring, decision-making, regulator, indoor temperature, India |
| Subjects: | sociology, artificial intelligence, sustainability and energy, financial and cost management, air quality, decision analysis, data collection methods, knowledge management, research methods, control systems, environmental engineering, Geography, building performance, asset management, systems engineering, mental health and wellbeing, housing and residential development, health risk and incident analysis, probability and distributions, infrastructure and transport systems, analytical methods, professional development, environmental science, construction type, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Cost Management, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Site Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here