de Moraes Goulart, F.; Joseph, A.; Jiang, Y.; Shokrollahi Ardekani, M. and Chandrika Bhanu, A. (2026) Healthcare staff evaluation of an emergency department mental health room: A virtual reality study. Building Research & Information, 54(5), pp. 632-651. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Emergency Department (ED) staff must rapidly adapt in response to Mental and Behavioral Health (MBH) patient needs. The purpose of this study was to compare two ED exam room design proposals (parallel and perpendicular bed positions) developed to address the need for flexibility and safety in the ED. Simulation-Based Evaluation (SBE) in Virtual Reality (VR) was conducted to evaluate ED staff perceptions of safety, effectiveness, and patient experience in the room at an early design stage. Twenty-seven ED staff members with experience managing MBH patients performed tasks in VR following a scripted scenario that consisted of a nurse caring for an MBH patient with an arm injury, verbalizing their feedback and experiences for both designs. Surveys and debriefing interviews were conducted to gather further insights. This study found that staff members evaluated the perpendicular bed position as safer for all users and afforded a more efficient workflow; Participants valued several features of the overall room design, including: (i) customizable room controls, (ii) sensory-friendly environment and (iii) flexible features, which allowed for a rapid transition from a medical to an MBH room. SBE confirmed that the perpendicular bed position was preferred by staff, and the findings guided future refinements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | acute pediatric care; emergency department; psychiatric care; simulation-based evaluation; virtual reality |
| Index terms: | proposal, virtual reality, mental health, early design stage, survey, interview, workflow, injury, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | management, performance management, data collection methods, health conditions and diseases, design process, virtual reality, project planning |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Project Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here