Eye-tracking and place attachment: Visual and emotional engagement in higher education atrium spaces

Wu, X.; Schmidt, R.; Wilcockson, T. D.; Wang, W. and Liu, H. (2026) Eye-tracking and place attachment: Visual and emotional engagement in higher education atrium spaces. Building Research & Information, 54(5), pp. 652-669. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This paper presents an exploratory investigation into how atrium design is associated with users' visual and emotional experiences. Focussing on spatial configuration and material qualities, the study integrates wearable eye-tracking with place attachment assessment to examine how users engage with real atrium environments. Thirty university students participated in on-site eye-tracking experiments measuring fixation duration, visit count, pupil diameter and time to first fixation, followed by a questionnaire on spatial familiarity and place attachment. Statistical comparisons and a random forest model were used to identify behavioural differences and indicative predictive patterns. Results suggest that participants with higher place attachment and familiarity exhibited more focussed attention, longer fixations and larger pupil diameters, potentially reflecting deeper emotional engagement. In contrast, low attachment and unfamiliar users demonstrated more exploratory and dispersed gaze patterns. The random forest classifier achieved an average accuracy of 62.6% in distinguishing high and low place attachment groups, indicating preliminary potential for linking gaze features, particularly pupil diameter and early visual attention, to emotional engagement. These findings underscore the value of visual metrics and psychological measures to understand how atrium design supports user experiences. They provide practical insights for architects seeking to enhance emotional connection through spatial openness and material articulation in higher-education environments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: atrium design; eye-tracking; human–environment interaction; place attachment; spatial cognition; visual behaviour
Index terms: university student, spatial configuration, questionnaire, cognition, forest, experiment, architect, higher education, investigation, user experience, accuracy, pupil, interaction, duration
Subjects: environmental science, profession, professional development, architectural design, behavioral psychology, educational institutions, cognitive psychology, user-centered design, project controls, data collection methods, sociology, curriculum design
Topics: Research Practice, Time Control, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Education, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here