Gharaibeh, L.; Lantz, B. and Eriksson, K. M. (2026) Bridging the gap: A framework for monetizing BIM by integrating industry insights for informed decision-making. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(2), pp. 710-728. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – This study addresses the critical imperative of quantifying building information modeling (bimalliance) benefits by augmenting existing methodologies, with a focus on monetization. Engaging industry practitioners, the research develops a comprehensive framework through an exhaustive literature review and a survey in the Swedish construction industry, incorporating insights from 128 respondents. Design/methodology/approach – The framework, validated by industry experts, systematically assesses tangible BIM benefits against associated costs. It introduces a novel method in construction, addressing the lack of a unified approach. The resulting framework facilitates nuanced feasibility determinations by systematically evaluating BIM benefits against costs. Findings – Despite its acknowledged limitations, the framework effectively captures a comprehensive range of costs and benefits, providing a more accurate and detailed estimation of BIM's impact on project outcomes. Practical implications – With practical implications, the framework enhances BIM understanding and application, contributing to effective project management throughout the construction supply chain lifecycle. Moreover, it aims to improve efficacy within the architecture, engineering, construction and operations industry. Originality/value – The study empowers organizations and decision-makers with a bespoke tool for evaluating BIM feasibility, contributing to decision-making through a clarified numerical representation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; decision support systems; estimating; novel method; value management |
| Index terms: | lifecycle, decision-making, literature review, methodology, survey, value management, decision support, estimation, construction industry, building information modelling, construction supply chain, project management, estimating, practitioner, project outcome |
| Subjects: | information systems, construction logistics, project management theory and practice, practitioner, industry analysis, management, research methods, data collection methods, project delivery, decision analysis, project completion, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Value Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here