Building security and resilience: A guide to implementing effective cybersecurity and data protection measures in smart cities

Lnenicka, M.; Kysela, T. and Horák, O. (2026) Building security and resilience: A guide to implementing effective cybersecurity and data protection measures in smart cities. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(2), pp. 908-937. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – As cities increasingly embrace smart technologies to enhance efficiency, sustainability and quality of life, integrating cybersecurity and data protection measures becomes paramount. This paper analyzes cybersecurity and data protection practices based on the existing strategies and projects in smart cities. Design/methodology/approach – A research methodology involving searching for resources, content analysis and the Delphi method was developed to select the sample of smart cities, identify relevant resources, analyze and categorize their content, validate their relevance and transform them into a list of recommendations. Findings – The findings include a validated list of 39 recommendations categorized into 6 categories for implementing robust cybersecurity and data protection measures in smart cities. We found that smart cities employ various measures to address cybersecurity and data protection, including technical solutions, organizational practices, policies and human resources initiatives. The smart economy and smart governance components are prioritized regarding data protection and cybersecurity measures, while smart living and smart environments receive less attention than others. There are regional differences in the implementation of cybersecurity measures, with Asia and Europe demonstrating higher levels of engagement. Originality/value – The paper provides an approach to select sample smart cities and analyze their strategies and projects in different contexts to gather and validate best practices. The measures identified contribute to building sustainable and resilient cities regarding urban governance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cybersecurity; data protection; Delphi method; governance; recommendations; smart city; strategy
Index terms: quality of life, efficiency, urban governance, smart governance, human resource, Delphi method, best practice, research methodology, implementation, Europe, resilient city, smart city, governance, strategy, smart environment, content analysis, Asia, methodology
Subjects: regions and continents, business, urban planning, health safety and environment, research methods, sustainability and resilience, contractual arrangements, urban sustainability, public and environmental health, management, physical geography and landforms, data analysis and analytics, performance management, research design and methodology, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Procurement, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here