Rasheed, E. O. and Wang, K. (2026) Do overall findings correlate with granular findings? An analysis of factors influencing office workers' thermal comfort and indoor air quality. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 44(5), pp. 1211-1231. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose – Research shows that occupants are generally satisfied when IEQ parameters fall within standard thresholds. However, granular data often suggest different outcomes. This study explored the impact of IAQ and TC, alongside contextual factors such as office type and working hours, on perceived comfort, satisfaction and productivity in an air-conditioned university office. Design/methodology/approach – The IEQ readings and occupant perceptions were collected and analysed. While annual averages for temperature, CO2 and humidity met recommended levels, the ANOVA revealed significant differences across individual offices and office types, with private offices showing more stable conditions. Findings – The survey results indicated overall satisfaction and productivity, but granular analysis revealed dissatisfaction related to limited control over temperature and ventilation. Worker perceptions did not differ significantly by office type, but longer working hours were associated with higher satisfaction with TC and lower satisfaction with IAQ and control. The regression analysis showed that exceedance frequencies, particularly humidity, had a greater – though statistically insignificant – influence on satisfaction than compliance frequencies. Originality/value – These results suggest that other, unmeasured factors may shape occupant perceptions. Overall, the study demonstrates the value of granular analysis in uncovering nuanced insights into workplace IEQ and supports its use in advancing building performance assessment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contextual factors; indoor air quality; indoor environmental quality; occupant perception; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | comfort, indoor air quality, productivity, methodology, thermal comfort, survey, working hours, humidity, building performance, regression analysis, ventilation, satisfaction, indoor environmental quality, compliance, occupant perception |
| Subjects: | air quality, project delivery, data collection methods, employment law, management, research methods, quality assurance, environmental engineering, statistical analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, health safety and environment, climate science, environmental health, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here