Ajisomo, T. O.; Saka, A.; Dauda, J. and Osuolale, M. (2025) Investigating circular economy barriers for construction and demolition waste in the construction industry: A Delphi and interpretive structural modelling approach. Construction Innovation, 26(4), pp. 1278-1308. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – This study examines the barriers to circular economy (CE) implementation for construction and demolition (C&D) waste management. This study aims to enhance the understanding of CE barriers and their interrelationships, facilitating targeted, context-specific interventions for sustainable waste management in developing economies. Design/methodology/approach – A pluralistic method was adopted, including a critical review of literature, a two-round Delphi survey using 22 and 17 experts and interpretive structural modelling (ISM) with nine experts in the Nigerian setting. Expert consensus on key barriers was established in the Delphi second round. Mean score ranking and interrater analysis were used to analyse Delphi responses, while ISM-based analysis and Matrice d'Impacts croises-multipication applique a classement analysis were used to explore contextual relationships between the barriers. Findings – The analysis revealed the significance of all examined barriers. The most crucial barriers include the pursuit of short-term profitability, insufficient construction waste data, lack of understanding and scarce funding. Equally, regulatory and supply chain followed by economic barriers, emerged as the most significant categories. ISM introduced a hierarchical model for the barriers, further classifying them into dependent, linkage and independent categories. Understanding these interactions provides a basis for prioritising interventions. Originality/value – This research presents a novel, structured analysis of the complex barriers to CE implementation in C&D waste management within the construction industry, particularly in developing economies. The findings offer practical insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to address these barriers in order of influence and criticality, thereby advancing sustainability and circularity in the construction sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; construction and demolition waste; construction industry; Delphi; interpretive structural modelling; waste management |
| Index terms: | construction sector, methodology, interaction, waste management, implementation, Delphi survey, construction waste, profitability, developing economy, funding, construction and demolition, interpretive structural modelling, construction industry, prioritizing, circularity, circular economy, linkage |
| Subjects: | waste management, behavioral psychology, economic analysis, industry analysis, data collection methods, sustainable design, contractual arrangements, decision analysis, economic development, sustainable materials, business, research methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, International Construction, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here