Clarke, L; Gleeson, C and Winch, C (2016) What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction? In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Three possible transition pathways to an energy efficient future - market-based, ecological modernisation, and radical transformation - are considered for the construction industry, responsible for 40% of European Union end-use emissions. Considerable obstacles to achieving low energy construction (LEC) are evident in the UK, and to a greater or lesser extent other European Union countries, including: a performance gap between design intention and on-site energy performance; sharp occupational interfaces where the main heat losses occur; declines in the level, breadth and quality of construction vocational education and training (VET); and the lack of a learning infrastructure on sites. Near zero energy building is very different from traditional forms, requiring greater 'thermal literacy' of all construction occupations, higher qualification levels, broader occupational profiles, integrated teamworking rather than self-employment and extended subcontracting chains, and better communication given the complex work processes involved. The paper argues that the required expertise is relative to the transition pathway adopted and in the UK a radical transformation of the existing structure of VET provision and of employment is needed for trainees and the workforce to acquire enhanced understanding of LEC, based on a broader concept of agency and backed up by rigorous enforcement of standards. At the same time, this radical transformation opens up the industry to greater diversity and inclusivity. It draws on research on a large-scale Canadian-coordinated project on Climate Change and Work and on interviews on construction sites and in college.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | low energy construction, vocational education and training, thermal literacy, professional expertise |
| Index terms: | qualification, interview, transformation, European Union, employment, subcontracting, occupation, construction site, self-employment, performance gap, zero-energy building, low-energy construction, climate change, transition pathway, construction industry, enforcement, vocational education and training, energy performance, agency, ecological modernization |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, organization, climate science, work location, sustainability and energy, energy systems, physical geography and landforms, management, performance management, educational resources, health safety and environment, business economics, sociology, industry analysis, student development |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Site Management, Education, Supply Chain Management, Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here