Soltanmohammadlou, N.; Hon, C. K. H.; Drogemuller, R.; Sheikhkhoshkar, M. and Rahimian, F. (2026) An advanced exploration of technological functionalities addressing risk factors in earthmoving equipment operation on construction sites: A systematic literature review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(5), pp. 1846-1876. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to analyze the current state of technological advancements research in addressing the diverse risk factors involved in earthmoving equipment operations through Rasmussen's (1997) risk management framework. It examines how existing technologies research capture, manage and disseminate risk information across various levels of safety management by defining their core functionalities. The research highlights gaps in current technological solutions research regarding the flow of information in the risk management framework. It emphasizes the need for an integrated approach in technological advancements to enhance the holistic safety management approach capable of capturing various risks across different levels of risk management. Design/methodology/approach – This research employs a multistep approach. Initially, earthmoving equipment risk factors and functionalities of technological solutions were identified through a systematic review of current scholarly works. Subsequently, social network analysis (SNA) and Pareto analysis were applied to evaluate and determine the importance of risk factors and functionalities of technologies for improving them. Findings – The findings highlight the importance of multilevel approaches that expand technological functionalities to address risk factors across all levels of Rasmussen's (1997) risk management framework. The current combination of technological advancements focuses primarily on on-site monitoring, congested work sites, site layout/path planning, utility problems, safety training, and blind spot and visibility. Site monitoring and warning systems, supported by sensors and computer vision (CV), are pivotal for identifying risks and enabling data-driven safety management. However, workforce-level cognitive factors (W1-W6), which influence safety behavior, remain underexplored for enhancing their functionality to anticipation and response during the operation. Prevention is the core function of current technological solutions, emphasizing the need to address human and equipment risk factors such as sources of hazards in earthmoving operations. Learning: AI as a data-driven approach and IoT systems are key for future development, and when grounded in ontology-based knowledge of earthwork, they gain a structured vision of earthmoving equipment types, their interactions and the earthwork activities. It enhances the capabilities of these technologies to capture and manage complex interactions between hazard sources (human and equipment), supporting comprehensive risk factors across all levels of the risk management framework. Originality/value – This paper elucidates that technological solutions for safety management in earthmoving equipment operations require a more holistic approach—grounded in an understanding of functionalities of technologies—to effectively capture risks across various levels of Rasmussen (1997) risk management. It emphasizes that technological solutions should not only address isolated hazards but also ensure the continuous flow of information on multiple risk factors across the risk management framework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction operations; earthmoving equipment; functionality; safety management; social network analysis; technology innovation |
| Index terms: | ontology, earthwork, holistic approach, social network analysis, risk factor, risk management, monitoring, site layout, functionality, systematic literature review, safety management, interaction, methodology, technology innovation, pareto analysis, prevention, construction operation, construction site, safety training, safety behaviour, integrated approach, exploration, earthmoving, computer vision |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, design features, financial risk, work location, quality control, risk assessment, site logistics, construction methods, behavioral psychology, occupational health and safety management, research evaluation and metrics, computer vision, automation and robotics, research methods, construction operations, business, education and knowledge transfer, control systems, environmental resource management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Risk Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Cost Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here