Ahankoob, A.; Calixto, V.; Abbasnejad, B. and Wong, P. S. P. (2026) A generative BIM approach for DfMA integration into building facade design. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(9), pp. 1858-1878. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The application of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) in facade design faces barriers due to fragmentation between design and manufacturing teams and limitations of traditional modelling. This paper develops an automated generative design workflow that integrates DfMA principles into facade cladding system design using Building Information Modelling (BIM) and visual programming tools. The methodology uses multi-objective optimization via genetic algorithms to minimize incomplete panels, reduce material waste, and enhance manufacturing efficiency while preserving design intent. A medical centre case study in Melbourne demonstrates the workflow's application across wall sections with varying orientations and geometries. The generative approach identifies optimal 1.85 × 2.5 m panel configurations, achieving 38.17% waste reduction in vertical orientation versus 57.09% in horizontal, and outperforming manual panelisation by up to 18.92% in material efficiency. The workflow enables real-time collaboration between designers and fabricators through parametric feedback loops, allowing fabrication constraints to inform design decisions during concept development. Analysis of 48 design alternatives reveals that systematic algorithmic optimization improves panelisation efficiency and identifies universal optimization principles for facade systems. This research presents a working prototype that integrates DfMA into standard BIM workflows, offering a replicable framework for automated facade optimization with demonstrated gains in material efficiency and manufacturing coordination.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; DfMA; façade fabrication; generative design; optimization; waste minimization |
| Index terms: | workflow, feedback loop, case study, designer, minimization, methodology, modelling, collaboration, waste reduction, generative design, genetic algorithm, geometry, fabrication, design decision, programming, multi-objective optimization, prototype, coordination, configuration, fragmentation, face, cladding, building information modelling, efficiency, integration |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, sustainability assessment, modelling and simulation, performance management, design process, management, building materials, mathematical modelling, organizational analysis, control systems, research methods, analytical methods, programming, manufacturing engineering, design practice, psychology, systems engineering, information systems, business, profession, algorithms |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here