Predicting the construction cost-time tradeoff using optimized hybrid deep learning for risk preference decision making

Cheng, M. Y.; Sholeh, M. N. and Poetra, B. A. (2026) Predicting the construction cost-time tradeoff using optimized hybrid deep learning for risk preference decision making. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(10), pp. 2018-2044. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Completing projects successfully within designated cost and time constraints is a central concern of the construction industry. Earned value management is a method widely used to control project performance by estimating the cost at completion (ECAC) and estimating the schedule at completion (ESAC). Previous studies applied machine learning for these estimates, but limitations in optimization and single-objective approaches require further improvement. In this study, the optimization model of the optical microscope algorithm (OMA), neural network (NN), and bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) methods were used to develop and test a novel model, the OMA-NN-BiLSTM, for ECAC and ESAC forecasting. The conflicting nature of and interdependencies between cost and time make handling these two output variables a tradeoff problem. Thus, a multi-objective optical microscope algorithm (MOOMA) was also developed to create a Pareto curve to represent this tradeoff graphically. Additionally, an indifference curve was calculated using a triangular preference function to represent decision-maker preferences. The tradeoff results were subsequently analyzed to calculate ECAC and ESAC values based on the tangent point between the Pareto and indifference curves. For the project case period selected (4th period), the optimal tradeoff forecast indicates project completion at 574 days at an estimated cost of $2,332,958.70.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost-time tradeoff; earned value management; multi-objective analysis; optical microscope algorithm; risk decision
Index terms: estimating, estimate, construction cost, construction industry, forecasting, preference, project performance, earned value management, tradeoff, machine learning, decision-making, neural network, deep learning
Subjects: financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, decision-making and reasoning, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, industry analysis, control systems, project management theory and practice
Topics: Cost Management, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here