Tseladikae, T.; Agumba, J.; Ochieng, G.; Adebowale, O. J. and Edwards, D. (2026) Correlation analysis of project management practices and performance outcomes in social housing projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(10), pp. 2085-2100. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
South Africa urgently requires low-income and subsidised housing projects to meet growing demand. However, these projects often yield unsatisfactory outcomes (including time and cost overruns as well as quality deficiencies) that are largely due to an inadequate understanding of effective project management practices (PMPs). This study examines correlations between key PMPs and project performance outcomes (PPOs) in South African Social Housing Projects (SHPs). A quantitative study was conducted using a questionnaire survey distributed to SMEs registered with the National Home Builders Registration Council (NHBRC) and the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). Of the 158 questionnaires administered, 116 valid responses were received, yielding a 73.41% response rate. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including Spearman correlation coefficients and exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed a positive correlation between PMPs and PPOs, with schedule, scope, quality and communication management significantly influencing PPOs, potentially by enhancing project coordination and stakeholder engagement. Procurement management showed no significant correlation, possibly indicating inefficiencies in its current implementation or a mismatch with measured performance dimensions, thereby highlighting areas for further research. These findings provide practical guidance for contractors and stakeholders to enhance efficiency and potentially improve project success rates and resource utilisation in SHP delivery.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | development program, small and medium enterprises, social housing projects; project management practices; project performance outcome; reconstruction and |
| Index terms: | project success, builder, resource utilization, South Africa, mismatch, performance outcome, reconstruction, construction industry development, social housing, exploratory factor analysis, survey, efficiency, housing project, procurement management, correlation analysis, dimension, program, income, questionnaire, coordination, cost overrun, project performance, statistics, project management practice, implementation, stakeholder engagement |
| Subjects: | management, contractual arrangements, Geography, mathematical modelling, value management, data collection methods, software systems, performance management, development economics, financial and cost management, project management theory and practice, procurement strategy, site logistics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, engineering problems, housing and residential development, community and social dimensions, building construction, practitioner, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, International Construction, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Site Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Project Management, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here