Patel, T.; Guo, B. H. W.; van der Walt, J. D. and Bapat, H. (2026) Vision-based automated road construction progress monitoring: Improved u-net segmentation approach. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(10), pp. 2154-2175. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Manual road construction progress monitoring (CPM) in road projects often leads to inefficiencies, delays, and cost overruns. While Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based photogrammetry has improved automated data collection, manual identification of as-built components and progress measurement still limits project control. This study introduces a UAV-based photogrammetry approach using deep learning segmentation to automate the detection and classification of road layers for automated road construction progress measurement. A road layer classifier, based on a pre-trained improved U-Net architecture with ResNet-34, was developed to classify and segment road layers, including the surface layer, base course, subbase course, and subgrade. To address the class imbalance, the classifier employs an inverse class frequency weighted cross-entropy loss, improving segmentation accuracy for underrepresented layers. The classifier achieved a validation accuracy of 97.87% with a loss of 8.08%. The method was validated with two real-world case studies through a web-based prototype, achieving high accuracies of 93.63 and 96.79% in automated progress measurement, confirming the feasibility of detecting pavement layers and measuring progress in real pavement construction projects. By automating critical aspects of road progress measurement, this approach significantly improves project control, enhances decision-making capabilities, and addresses the critical need for more efficient and reliable construction progress monitoring systems in the industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; construction progress monitoring; deep learning; road construction; transfer learning; UAV |
| Index terms: | unmanned aerial vehicle, pavement construction, prototype, progress monitoring, cost overrun, road project, project control, case study, deep learning, automation, entropy, decision-making, validation, progress measurement, road construction, accuracy |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, thermal systems, financial and cost management, data collection methods, decision analysis, modelling and simulation, control systems, infrastructure engineering, project controls, professional development, civil engineering, automation and robotics |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Time Control, Project Management, Information Management, Risk Management, Cost Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here