Integrating coastal segmentation on predictive modeling for data-driven bridge asset management

Thach, H. P.; Nguyen, L. D. and Nguyen, V. T. (2026) Integrating coastal segmentation on predictive modeling for data-driven bridge asset management. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(10), pp. 2228-2244. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The number of deteriorating bridges is increasing, particularly in coastal areas that are frequently exposed to strong winds and severe storms, presents critical challenge for infrastructure asset management. This study introduces a machine learning-based framework for automating the prediction of bridge conditions, focusing on three key components: substructure, deck, and superstructure. To account for environmental variability, the dataset was segmented into coastal and inland subsets. The Boruta algorithm was applied to identify significant factors. Eight machine learning models, K-nearest neighbors, Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Catboost, XG-Boost, and Gradient Boosting Machines, were subsequently developed for bridge condition prediction. Among the eight machine learning models, the KNN model achieved the highest prediction accuracies of 92.38% for substructure, 91.48% for deck, and 90.45% for superstructure. Optimal segmentation distances were identified as 12 km for the substructure, 16 km for the deck condition prediction model, and 6 km for the superstructure condition prediction model. The t-test results confirmed statistically significant differences between coastal and inland models, emphasizing the varying impacts of environmental factors on bridge conditions. This study provides transportation agencies a reliable, data-driven decision support tool for maintenance planning, contributing to more efficient and targeted bridge asset management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge asset management; coastal data segmentation; construction management; infrastructure system; integration
Index terms: predictive modelling, integration, forest, variability, decision tree, coastal areas, asset management, prediction model, environmental factor, transportation agency, artificial neural network, accuracy, machine learning, decision support, infrastructure asset management, dataset
Subjects: data management, artificial intelligence, physical geography and landforms, modelling and simulation, prediction and forecasting, decision analysis, organizational analysis, asset management, transportation engineering, statistical analysis, professional development, environmental science
Topics: Risk Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here