A macroeconomic analysis of insolvency in the UK construction industry

Yung, P.; Saka, A. B. and Caborn, S. E. (2025) A macroeconomic analysis of insolvency in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(5), pp. 3457-3484. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – This paper examines macroeconomic factors affecting insolvency level in the UK construction industry. Design/methodology/approach – A lagged dependent variable (LDV) model is proposed which adequately addressed the serial correlation and endogeneity problems commonly existed in time series data. Objective macroeconomic data from Q3 1997 to Q4 2023 are used to evaluate seven refutable hypotheses. Findings – It is found that higher unemployment rate or annual interest burden leads to higher number of insolvencies, while higher construction output value or interest rate leads to lower insolvencies. Domino effect in construction insolvency is also confirmed. Research limitations/implications – The proposed solutions to the missing data on 3 quarters and the changes in the industry breakdown methods during the study period might have affected the accuracy and consistency of data. Practical implications – The paper provides objective insights to factors affecting construction insolvency, offering tools for future policy formulation. Social implications – Knowing factors affecting insolvencies helps formulating solutions. Originality/value – Previous studies on insolvency in construction industry have largely focused on prediction of insolvency of individual companies using firm level financial data, which are symptoms of failure rather than root causes. Studies using questionnaires could be subjective and the limited studies using macroeconomic factors often have methodological issues. This paper bridges the gap by analysing objective macroeconomic data with a sound methodology.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; insolvency; ldv model; macroeconomic; time series data; UK
Index terms: endogeneity, methodology, accuracy, insolvency, construction industry, construction insolvency, interest rate, time series, unemployment, questionnaire, dependent variable, construction output
Subjects: data collection methods, data science, research methods, industry analysis, financial analysis, statistical analysis, professional development, operations management, risk assessment, economic analysis, liability law
Topics: Cost Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here