Framework agreements in a post-recession economy

Donohoe, S and Coggins, J K (2016) Framework agreements in a post-recession economy. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.

Abstract

Framework Agreements in a Post Recession EconomyFramework Agreements (FAs) in the UK Construction industry emerged following influential reports into construction by Sir Michael Latham and Sir John Egan respectively. Throughout the 1990's and into the new millennium FAs were increasingly used as a procurement strategy in the construction industry due to their so-called "win-win" ethos for construction clients and contractors. This culminated in the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) publishing  binding and non-binding forms of FAs in 2005.Following a recent global worldwide economic recession it is pertinent to ask the question whether  FAs represent an idea whose time has come and gone or if FAs have survived as a procurement strategy and if so, in what way.This research reports on the effect of a major economic recession on the use of FAs and explores whether or not FAs remain a viable sustainable procurement option.A quantitative survey of clients, professional consultants and contractors was carried out to establish opinions of interested stakeholders.The research findings indicate that whilst FAs are still used b significant stakeholders, many have abandoned FAs in favour of traditional price based competition. Reasons are postulated for this apparent shift and suggestions made for the potential revival of FAs.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: law; contracts; framework agreements; procurement; post-recession
Index terms: competition, construction industry, JCT, option, agreements, recession, Joint Contracts Tribunal, framework agreement, Latham, survey, procurement strategy, construction client
Subjects: market analysis, industry policy reports, decision analysis, industry analysis, contract formation, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, data collection methods, standard forms of contract, standard-form contract drafting bodies, practitioner
Topics: Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Governance, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here