Lu, W.; Wu, L.; Yang, Z.; Peng, Z. and Chu, L. (2025) A deployable agile blockchain as a service (abaas) framework for construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(5), pp. 3919-3956. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to develop an agile blockchain as a service (aBaaS) framework for construction projects, which will support blockchain design, deployment and operation in a flexible, agile and cost-effective manner. Design/methodology/approach – This research adopts a design science research method. The aBaaS framework is then substantiated through two case studies pertinent to construction projects. Findings – It is found to be highly flexible, achieving high completion rates in customizing the design, deployment and visualization of blockchain systems within given periods. Also, the aBaaS framework is highly agile and cost-effective, capable of responding to changes with low person-day units and labor cost. Research limitations/implications – Limited sub-service components are built in design management as services (DMSs), deployment as services (DESs) and visualization as services (VISs) of aBaaS framework. Practical implications – This research offers a reference for those aiming to realize the potential of blockchain in construction projects. Originality/value – Firstly, it introduces a novel, flexible modular-build DMSs method to help system developers design blockchain systems for projects. Secondly, it improves the blockchain deployment methods by offering plug-and-play DESs for projects. Thirdly, it accelerates the visualization processes for blockchain users in projects by offering them flexible, click-to-go and cost-effective VISs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agility; blockchain as a service; case study; construction; project |
| Index terms: | customizing, blockchain, construction project, design science research, case study, labour cost, methodology, design management, visualization |
| Subjects: | cost management, design practice, computing systems, production management, research methods, data collection methods, design process, construction manufacturing |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here