Xie, L.; Yu, Z. and Zhao, X. (2025) Assessing construction safety risks in large urban complex projects: An interval ordinal priority approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(5), pp. 3996-4018. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – To meet an ever - increasing urbanization demand, urban complex projects have evolved to form the development type of HOPSCA (an acronym for Hotel, Office, Park, Shopping mall, Convention and Apartment, representing a new type of urban complex). Its integrated functions, complex structures and superior siting expose HOPSCA's construction phase to higher and more uncertain safety risks. Despite this, research on construction safety risks of large urban complexes is scarce. This study addresses this by introducing the interval ordinal priority approach (Interval-OPA) method to build a safety risk assessment model for HOPSCA, targeting its construction safety risk management. Design/methodology/approach – This study initially identifies risk factors via literature review, field survey and three Delphi method rounds, forming a construction safety risk list of HOPSCA projects. Then, Interval-OPA is employed to create a safety risk assessment model, and its validity confirmed through a representative case study of an ongoing project. Lastly, uncertainty and weighting analyses of the model results identify the most probable major construction accidents, safety risk factors and targeted prevention strategies for the urban complex projects construction phase. Findings – The findings reveal that (1) there are 33 construction safety risks in HOPSCA's construction phase across 4 aspects: "man-machine-environment-management" (2) object strikes are the most prominent of accidents and need to be prioritized for prevention, especially when managerial risks are arising; (3) falls from heights are evaluated with the highest level of uncertainty, which represents an ambiguous area for safety management and (4) the result of the risk evaluation shows that there are nine critical construction safety risk factors for the HOPSCA project and that most of the management-level risk factors have high uncertainty. This study explores and provides effective measures to combat these factors. Originality/value – This study innovatively applies the Interval-OPA method to risk assessment, offering a fitting method for evaluating the HOPSCA project's construction safety risks and accidents. The model aids decision-makers in appropriate risk classification and selection of scientific risk prevention strategies, enhances HOPSCA's construction safety management system and even benefits all under-construction projects, promoting the construction industry's sustainable development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety risk; hopsca; interval ordinal priority approach; risk evaluation |
| Index terms: | risk assessment, hotel, construction safety, construction industry, management system, urbanization, construction project, validity, risk management, Delphi method, sustainable development, falls, safety management, risk factor, prevention, complex project, survey, methodology, construction phase, case study, construction accident, literature review, strategy |
| Subjects: | research methods, evaluation and assessment methods, industry analysis, management, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment, occupational health and safety management, strategic project management, production management, environmental hazards, urban planning, health risk and incident analysis, environmental health, financial risk, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here