Integrated statutory waste management framework for the sustainable built environment

Selvam, G.; Kamalanandhini, M.; Velpandian, M.; Hariharan, R.; Mohanakrishna, S. and Thirumurugan, V. (2026) Integrated statutory waste management framework for the sustainable built environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(5), pp. 4078-4097. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Rapid urbanization and economic progress generate a significant quantity of waste from the built environment. Unawareness among the key stakeholders about the statutory requirements for waste management leads to ineffective practices and severe environmental concerns. The aim of this study is to develop an integrated statutory waste management framework (ISWMF) for the built environment to identify and implement the legal aspects of waste management practices in a national context. Design/methodology/approach – About eight waste management rules were considered to identify the statutory requirements from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. A total of 12 statutory requirements for the seven organizational contexts were identified. Through inferential statistics, stakeholder awareness about the legal requirements of waste management practices was assessed. An integrated statutory waste management framework was developed and evaluated by implementing it in a one-year case study project. Findings – The results observed that 70% of stakeholders in the built environment are unaware of the statutory requirements for the waste management practices. The framework's adoption correctly identified the statutory requirements for waste management practices in different organizational contexts. Implementing the statutory requirements in the case study project resulted in a reduction of 308 tons of CO2 emissions. Furthermore, the circular economy promoted 35.67 tons of recyclable materials. Also, enabled the organization to maintain all the compliance requirements related to the aspects of waste management. Research limitations/implications – The researchers will use the findings to understand the statutory requirements for waste management practices in the built environment. A continuous improvement interface shall be further developed to synchronize the upcoming amendments or changes in the statutory requirements. Practical implications – The research findings will enable industry practitioners or any organization to identify and understand their statutory requirements for waste management practices. Implementing the framework will mutually benefit the organization and the environment. Social implications – The research findings promote awareness about the statutory requirements of waste management practices among the stakeholders in the built environment. Furthermore, the actual implementation of the proposed framework significantly increases recycling promotion and reduces the environmental CO2 footprint. Originality/value – This study is the first to take into account the actual statutory requirements for various wastes generated from the built environment within a national context. The proposed framework can also be applied in other national contexts, taking into account the relevant waste management rules and acts. Additionally, the reported benefits encompass both environmental and economic aspects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: awareness; built environment; carbon footprint; statutory requirements; waste management
Index terms: methodology, waste management, case study, CO2 emissions, environmental concern, India, carbon footprint, promotion, recycling, implementation, climate change, statistics, continuous improvement, built environment, urbanization, practitioner, forest, circular economy, compliance
Subjects: environmental science, infrastructure and transport systems, health safety and environment, practitioner, climate science, environmental impact, urban planning, environmental issues, management, contractual arrangements, Geography, mathematical modelling, sustainable design, research methods, data collection methods, air quality, waste management, performance measurement
Topics: Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Governance, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here