Li, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, J. and Guan, X. (2026) How the relationship quality of owner-contractor affects technological innovation performance in megaprojects: The mediating role of resource orchestration. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5155-5179. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Technological innovation in megaprojects represents a form of innovation that transcends enterprise boundaries and relies on close collaboration among innovators. The relationship between project owners and contractors is crucial for the successful technological innovation in megaprojects. However, limited research investigates the mechanism of how the owner–contractor relationship effectively affects technological innovation in the context of megaprojects. This study aims to explore the effect of relationship quality (RQ) on the technological innovation performance (TIP) of megaprojects from an owner–contractor perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the resource orchestration theory framework, this study develops a mechanism through which owner–contractor RQ influences the megaprojects' TIP and examines the mediating roles of three sub-processes of resource orchestration–resource structuring (ROS), resource bundling (ROB) and resource leveraging (ROL). Using data collected from 192 professionals involved in megaprojects, this study empirically tests the conceptual model using partial least squares-structural equation modeling. Findings – Results indicate that owner–contractor RQ positively impacts both TIP and resource orchestration in megaprojects. ROB and ROL play a partial mediating role, whereas ROS does not have a substantial mediating effect. Originality/value – This paper verifies the positive effect of the owner-contractor RQ on the TIP of megaprojects and reveals the development mechanisms for utilizing ROB and ROL to enhance TIP. The findings can guide owners and contractors in strengthening their relationship to better manage and coordinate resources, thereby improving TIP in megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | megaprojects; relationship quality; resource bundling; resource leveraging; resource orchestration; resource structuring; technological innovation performance |
| Index terms: | technological innovation, partial least square, strengthening, boundaries, methodology, megaproject, structural equation modelling, bundling, collaboration, owner |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, strategic project management, innovation and technology management, statistical analysis, research methods, property law, management, sociology, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Cost Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here