Principal component analysis of factors influencing the choice of procurement methods for the procurement of construction materials in Ghana

Obeng-Ahenkora, N. K.; Danso, H. and Kheni, N. A. (2026) Principal component analysis of factors influencing the choice of procurement methods for the procurement of construction materials in Ghana. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5300-5317. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Procurement and supply of construction materials are crucial aspects of the construction sector and therefore require attention for their development. Project objectives are fulfilled through the appropriate selection of procurement methods, thereby ensuring value for money. This research aimed to analyse the factors that influence the choice of procurement methods for the procurement of construction materials in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach – Data from building construction professionals in Ghana was collected for the study, with a total of 360 usable data received and used in the study's analysis. Factor analysis was employed to summarize the variables into components. Four main factors were identified: project specification factors, project tendering factors, project risk management considerations and client and stakeholder factors. Correlation analysis was conducted to establish the relationships among these variables and their impact on the corresponding factors. Findings – The study identified four main factors influencing the choice of procurement methods: project specification factors, project tendering factors, project risk management considerations and client and stakeholder factors. These factors correlated positively and significantly. The findings suggest that these factors play a crucial role in the effective selection of procurement methods. Practical implications – Generally, this research contributes to the understanding of the factors influencing the choice of procurement methods in Ghana. The Ghanaian government can utilise these findings to develop programmes aimed at addressing the factors that mitigate the negative consequences of inefficient procurement procedures for building materials. Procurement entities could incorporate this study into their decision-making processes regarding the selection of procurement methods to ensure effective project outcomes. Originality/value – This study provides novel insights into the factors influencing procurement method selection in Ghana's construction sector. By identifying and analysing these factors, the research offers valuable information for policymakers and practitioners to enhance procurement practices and achieve better project outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction materials; construction procurement; procurement; procurement methods
Index terms: Ghana, principal component analysis, factor analysis, programme, building material, methodology, specification, correlation analysis, decision-making process, construction procurement, building construction, construction sector, practitioner, value-for-money, construction material, procurement method, project risk management, project outcome
Subjects: financial risk, evaluation, practitioner, building construction, statistical analysis, research methods, industry analysis, contractual arrangements, Geography, building materials, project controls, decision analysis, contractual condition, project completion
Topics: Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Time Control, Project Management, Value Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here