Gu, T.; Hu, J.; Song, X.; Yan, H. and Chen, Z. (2026) How to enhance the urban community resilience from the perspective of social networks? A case study of xuzhou, China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5340-5363. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to enhance urban community resilience from the perspective of social networks in mitigating disaster impacts. It addresses the critical gap in systematic quantifying resilience, with a particular focus on stakeholder interactions within urban communities. Design/methodology/approach – The study proposes an integrated framework leveraging social network analysis (SNA) to map stakeholder interactions across three distinct phases. Network metrics are employed as evaluation indicators, while a hybrid evaluation model combining the coefficient of variation (COV) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) is utilized to quantify resilience levels of urban communities. Findings – Applying the framework to Community F in Xuzhou City revealed significant variations in social networks during the three phases, with the disaster response phase demonstrating the most intense interactions. Furthermore, the resilience levels exhibited a consistent downward trend across three phases. Originality/value – This research provides a novel approach to disaster management and resilience by integrating SNA with hybrid evaluation models. It advances theoretical insights and provides practical strategies for enhancing urban community resilience, contributing to the reduction of urban vulnerabilities to disasters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | resilience evaluation; social network; stakeholders; urban community resilience |
| Index terms: | urban community, social network analysis, China, preference, variation, disaster response, vulnerability, topsis, interaction, case study, strategy, disaster management, methodology, social network |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, management, sociology, data collection methods, decision-making and reasoning, contractual condition, environmental hazards, decision-making and optimization, community and social dimensions, financial risk, behavioral psychology, emergency and crisis management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here