Alwashah, Z.; Sweis, G. J.; Abu Hajar, H.; Abu-Khader, W. and Sweis, R. (2026) Awareness and willingness to adopt Construction 4.0 technologies: Evidence from Jordan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5364-5383. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This research endeavors to assess the extent of awareness concerning Construction 4.0 technologies and ascertain the willingness to adopt these technologies within the construction industry in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach – The quantitative method was adopted by reviewing relevant literature to compile a list of Industry 4.0 techniques and their application in the construction industry. A questionnaire was distributed to respondents from various institutions and companies in Jordan to achieve the desired study objectives. The questionnaire was analyzed with SPSS using statistical tests such as mean score, relative importance index and the Wallis H test. Findings – After collecting the quantitative data, the results showed that the majority of respondents have low awareness of Construction 4.0 technologies and greater awareness of some technologies like social media, Building information modeling (BIM) and the Internet of Things. In addition, the study showed a high willingness among the Jordanian respondents to adopt new technologies such as BIM, simulation tools and models, 3D printing and drones. Originality/value – This study presents insights and data regarding the current state of knowledge and advancements in Jordan related to Construction 4.0 concepts and techniques. Additionally, it explores the industry's willingness to adopt these technologies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; construction 4.0; digitization; industry 4.0; internet of things; Jordan; smart construction site; virtual and augmented reality |
| Index terms: | building information modelling, social media, simulation tool, questionnaire, construction 4.0, construction site, drone, augmented reality, Jordan, quantitative method, industry 4.0, statistical test, methodology, 3D printing, new technology, internet, construction industry, relative importance index, evidence |
| Subjects: | work location, visualization, computing systems, digital engineering, industry analysis, manufacturing, risk assessment, innovation and technology management, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, technology adoption, information systems, automation and robotics, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, statistical analysis, Geography, research methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Risk Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here