Emuze, F; Linake, M and Seboka, L (2016) Construction work and the housekeeping challenge in Lesotho. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Contemporary construction management literature has provided evidences of several advances in construction practice, especially in relation to site management. A key element of such advances is the provision of an environment in which construction work is completed without exposing people to any form of harm. Among other issues, the removal of physical hazards on construction sites is dependent on housekeeping, which is a source of genuine worry in the industry in Maseru, Lesotho. This paper reports the outcome of a research, which sought responses to "how can housekeeping be improved in Lesotho construction?" With a multiple case study research design in which field work entails direct site observations and interviews with site supervisors, the study established the poor state of housekeeping and their impact on people in the work environment in Lesotho. The use of the 5-Why root cause analysis shows that unsafe work practices go hand-in-hand with poor housekeeping on most visited project sites. Inadequate methods of keeping the construction site clean are exacerbated by poor storage and disposal of construction materials and wastes on the sites visited in the research. The importance of housekeeping in a craft based industry, such as Lesotho, is hinged on the health, safety, and wellbeing of workers, apart from site productivity. Continued poor housekeeping on project sites in Lesotho negatively impacts on the industry. The evidence from the research shows that it is time for multi-stakeholder interventions that would eliminate poor housekeeping in the industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; housekeeping; project; site; Lesotho |
| Index terms: | interview, case study, productivity, construction site, research design, well-being, site management, construction material, site supervisor, work practice, construction work, work environment, evidence, Lesotho, root cause analysis |
| Subjects: | mental health and wellbeing, research design and methodology, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, risk assessment, practitioner, building materials, work location, operations management, construction operations, management, Geography |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here