Zhang, K.; Ye, G.; Xiang, Q. and Chang, Y. (2026) Influencing mechanism of optimism bias on construction worker's unsafe behavior: The role of risk perception and risk propensity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5384-5399. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Unsafe behaviors among construction workers have been a critical topic in research on construction safety. As a prominent predictor of unsafe behaviors, optimism bias has received increasing attention. However, the mechanism by which optimism bias affects unsafe behaviors remains inadequately explored. To fill in the research gap, this study aimed to empirically investigate the influence of optimism bias on construction workers' unsafe behaviors through two variables: risk perception and risk propensity. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 262 Chinese construction workers by questionnaire, and the structural equation model and PROCESS macro were employed to test the research hypothesis. Findings – The results demonstrated that optimism bias positively influences workers' unsafe behaviors through the mediating variable of risk perception. In other words, respondents believed that a bad outcome would not happen to them, which is a sign of optimism bias. This would lead them to underestimate the risks of surroundings and weaken their motivation to take safety precautions. In addition, risk propensity positively moderated the effect of optimism bias on unsafe behaviors, that is, the higher the level of workers' risk propensity, the stronger the effect of optimism bias on unsafe behavior. Originality/value – This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the potential intermediate mechanism and boundary condition by which optimism bias affects workers' unsafe behaviors, and provides effective guidance to managers in taking de-biasing measures, which is of great significance in decreasing safety accidents in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; optimism bias; risk perception; risk propensity; unsafe behavior |
| Index terms: | manager, boundary condition, optimism bias, unsafe behaviour, methodology, motivation, risk propensity, construction worker, construction safety, structural equation model, construction industry, risk perception, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, financial risk, environmental health, environmental hazards, psychology, practitioner, statistical analysis, research methods, cognitive psychology, industry analysis, decision-making and reasoning, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Human Resources, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here