Wan, M.; Li, L.; Yuan, M. and Yin, X. (2026) Modeling stakeholder-associated risk networks in the life cycle of building-integrated photovoltaic projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5469-5494. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Building-integrated photovoltaic projects (BIPVPs) integrate BIPV technology into buildings, advancing them into green buildings while bringing new risk challenges. These risks are highly uncertain and intricately interconnected. This research aims to examine the dynamic characteristics of BIPVP risks from a network perspective and propose strategies to guide more effective risk management. Design/methodology/approach – Risk factors are identified through a literature review and interviews, then categorized by life cycle and stakeholders. Subsequently, focus group discussions evaluate risk interactions, and social network analysis (SNA) is applied to visualize and calculate the risk network. Finally, expert interviews are organized to propose strategies for challenges. Findings – This research revealed the high-density characteristics of the risk network in BIPVPs, indicating strong interconnections among risks. Risks in the feasibility study and construction stages were the most prominent, with developers, manufacturers and contractors occupying central roles in risk propagation. Network analysis identified eight major challenges throughout the life cycle of BIPVPs: missing policies, low acceptance, uncertain costs, weak design, material shortages, poor coordination, module failure and difficult recovery. These challenges reflected the combined influence of technological, economic, policy and managerial factors. Originality/value – This research connects risks with stakeholders, enhancing risk management knowledge for BIPVPs. The risk list and response strategies offer practical guidance for project participants in managing risks effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building-integrated photovoltaic projects; entire life cycle; risk interactions; social network analysis; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | network analysis, green building, construction stages, social network analysis, manufacturer, coordination, recovery, feasibility study, risk management, density, interaction, focus group, risk factor, photovoltaic, propagation, module, shortages, interview, modelling, methodology, literature review, strategy, life cycle |
| Subjects: | engineering process, project delivery, data collection methods, design stages, data analysis and analytics, value management, management, energy systems, research methods, architectural elements, analytical methods, operations management, practitioner, behavioral psychology, design practice, environmental hazards, economic analysis, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Risk Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here