Hajikazemi, S.; Duryan, M.; Smyth, H.; Yuan, F. and Liu, C. (2026) Exploring mindfulness as a tool for recognition and prevention of burnout in construction and engineering. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5675-5694. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Employees in the construction and engineering sectors face significant risks of burnout and job stress due to high-pressure environments, tight deadlines and demanding workloads. These industries often require long hours and intense focus, leading to physical and mental exhaustion. The constant need to meet project goals and manage complex tasks can result in chronic stress, negatively impacting workers' health and productivity. Without effective stress management strategies and organizational support, employees are at a heightened risk of experiencing burnout, which can lead to decreased job satisfaction, increased absenteeism and higher turnover rates. Design/methodology/approach – The research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 32 professionals, including construction and engineering project team members and managers. Grounded in the job demands-resources theory, the study investigates the role of cognitive-behavioural techniques, specifically mindfulness, as a job resource to prevent burnout. The methodology focuses on exploring mindful well-being as a mitigation strategy and emphasizes the need for organizational mindfulness to create a supportive culture and systemic practices within construction and engineering organizations. Findings – The research findings indicate that mindfulness-based practices can significantly help construction and engineering professionals recognize early warning signs of burnout, serving as a valuable personal resource. However, the study also emphasizes that sustainable solutions to burnout require organizational mindfulness. This involves fostering a supportive culture, implementing systemic practices and prioritizing such practices, within these organizations. By integrating mindfulness at both individual and organizational levels, the research suggests a comprehensive approach to effectively mitigate burnout and enhance overall well-being in these high-stress industries. Originality/value – The originality and value of this research lie in its tendency to explain that while mindfulness is known and applied as a useful tool for recognizing and preventing burnout, it is not sufficient on its own. The research underscores the necessity of fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes mental health and well-being. Therefore, in addition to individual mindfulness, the research stresses the importance of organizational mindfulness to ensure a sustainable mitigation strategy for addressing job stress and burnout. This dual focus on individual and systemic approaches offers a holistic solution to enhance well-being and productivity in high-stress industries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | burnout; construction and engineering organisations; early warning signs; job demand-resources theory; mindfulness |
| Index terms: | manager, absenteeism, well-being, prevention, workload, early warning, productivity, management strategy, methodology, prioritizing, interview, job satisfaction, organizational culture, strategy, turnover, job stress, mitigation, project team, mental health, qualitative approach, face, mindfulness, job demand, burnout |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, data collection methods, decision analysis, project delivery, business management, health conditions and diseases, sociology, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, financial risk, mental health and wellbeing, psychology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Cost Management, Risk Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here