Improving detection of pollution fee declarations for environmental policy compliance through metaheuristic-optimized ensemble learning

Chou, J. S.; Yeh, P. C.; Liu, C. Y. and Chen, K. J. (2026) Improving detection of pollution fee declarations for environmental policy compliance through metaheuristic-optimized ensemble learning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5820-5848. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Given that the governments mandate industries to declare and pay fees for soil and groundwater contamination, relying on self-reporting creates risks of underreporting through fraudulent documentation. This study aims to address fraudulent pollution fee declarations by developing an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) detection model that enhances compliance with environmental policies. Design/methodology/approach – This study integrates the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and a forensic-based investigation (FBI) metaheuristic algorithm with ensemble machine learning to detect fraudulent declarations effectively. The model is optimized for class imbalance, ensuring strong performance across key metrics, including accuracy, precision, specificity, F1 score and area under the curve (AUC). Findings – The proposed model improves the detection of fraudulent pollution fee declarations and enhances the identification of tax evasion cases. Results indicate that combining data class imbalance techniques with model hyperparameter optimization significantly enhances the model's ability to distinguish between fraudulent and legitimate reports. Practical implications – This study enhances fraud detection in pollution fee declarations, ensuring that financial resources are allocated appropriately to remediation efforts. Reducing tax evasion and improving regulatory oversight support environmental sustainability, strengthen public health protections and promote fairer compliance practices, ultimately leading to more effective environmental policies and enforcement. Originality/value – This research presents a novel approach to environmental compliance monitoring using SMOTE-based ensemble learning optimized by the FBI algorithm, offering a scalable and adaptable solution for global regulatory frameworks. This methodological advancement enhances data-driven decision-making, improves fraud detection accuracy and streamlines compliance inspections, significantly outperforming traditional monitoring techniques.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental policy compliance; machine learning in environmental management; metaheuristic algorithm; pollution detection; remediation fee declaration; soil and groundwater pollution
Index terms: monitoring, environmental management, machine learning, accuracy, methodology, fraud, artificial intelligence, pollution, data-driven decision-making, environmental policy, inspection, contamination, groundwater, environmental sustainability, documentation, investigation, public health, enforcement, compliance, mandate, minority
Subjects: research methods, quality assurance, control systems, public policy, sociology, artificial intelligence, data collection methods, decision analysis, sustainability assessment, professional ethics, water management, environmental health, political science, health safety and environment, professional development
Topics: Risk Management, Health and Safety, Ethics, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Governance, Quality Management, Information Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here