Wang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Cui, W. and Zhou, G. (2026) Comparison of five meta-heuristic algorithms in layout optimization of multiple tower cranes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5849-5873. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Five advanced multiobjective optimization algorithms—adaptive geometry estimation-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (AGE-MOEA) and its enhanced version, adaptive grid-based evolutionary multiobjective algorithm II (AGE-MOEA-II), non-dominant sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), non-dominant sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) and multiple objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) —are employed to determine the optimal layout strategies for multiple tower cranes. The goal is to minimize safety risks while maximizing coverage rate. Additionally, the performance of these five optimization algorithms is compared. Design/methodology/approach – Based on previous research, this paper considers the number, radius and positioning of multiple tower cranes as decisive variables while incorporating temporary facilities as constraints. Five advanced multiobjective optimization algorithms—AGE-MOEA, AGE-MOEA-II, NSGA-II, NSGA-III and MOPSO—are used to identify optimal tower crane layout strategies, aiming to minimize safety risks and maximize coverage rate. Subsequently, these algorithms are evaluated through a performance comparison using generation distance (GD), generation distance plus (GD+), inverted generation distance (IGD), inverted generation distance plus (IGD+) and hypervolume (HV). Findings – Research confirms the effectiveness of these five algorithms in optimizing multiple tower cranes layout. The results show that MOPSO produces lower quality pareto front solutions than the other four algorithms, with a significant gap between optimization outcomes for safety risks and coverage rate. While MOPSO has the shortest runtime, its performance is suboptimal. Each algorithm has its strengths, and the final choice should be based on project-specific requirements. Originality/value – This study employs five algorithms—AGE-MOEA, AGE-MOEA-II, NSGA-II, NSGA-III and MOPSO—to optimize the layout of multiple tower cranes, balancing safety risks minimization with maximum coverage rate. It also laid the foundation for optimizing the layout of more complex multiple tower cranes. Our analysis, combining graphical visualizations with rigorous performance metrics, provides data-driven support for evaluating each algorithm's strengths and limitations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coverage rate; layout optimization; multiobjective optimization; multiple tower cranes; optimization algorithms; safety risks |
| Index terms: | methodology, optimization algorithm, minimization, strategy, heuristic, tower crane, genetic algorithm, performance metric, effectiveness, visualization, geometry, evolutionary algorithm, estimation |
| Subjects: | design practice, algorithms, risk assessment, performance measurement, maintenance engineering, financial and cost management, performance management, research methods, mathematical modelling, management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Design Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here