Farrokhshad, M; Chan, P W and Blackwell, P (2016) Opening up risk management through goffman's dramaturgical approach. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Risk management is a longstanding topic of interest in the field of construction management research. Previous scholarship tended to focus on the development and application of various quantitative tools to analyse risk and identify appropriate risk mitigating strategies. The underlying assumption in prevailing scholarship on risk management in construction is that risk is some thing that needs to be controlled and eradicated. Far less attention is paid to examining risk management as a qualitatively dynamic process of what people do in everyday organization practices. . In this paper, we draw on the work of Erving Goffman and his dramaturgical analytical approach as one way to unlock the analysis of risk management as a form of social interaction. We argue that a Goffman-inspired dramaturgical analytical approach offers us the possibility of examining actions and performance rooted in everyday organisational routines. The dramaturgical approach can help us understand why an individual might 'act' or engage in impression management techniques to manipulate others, and establish interaction boundaries using the 'front-stage' and 'back-stage' metaphors to view the workplace as a stage where a satisfactory work performance is judged not by abstractions of performance measures (e.g. key performance indicators and targets) but by the performance of work through text, words, and gestures. Thus, we look towards organisational routines as the unit of analysis in examining the role of the back stage and front stage in dynamically staging notions of risk and how impression management techniques are played out in doing risk and risk management in construction. We conclude with implications of adopting a Goffman-inspired view to question risk and risk management in construction.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dramaturgical analysis; goffman; risk management; routines |
| Index terms: | routine, key performance indicator, management research, strategy, performance measure, risk management, organizational routine, boundaries, social interaction, work performance, interaction |
| Subjects: | operations management, property law, project delivery, risk assessment, business, research design and methodology, sociology, behavioral psychology, management, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here