Retrospective BIM performance analysis based on construction big data

Bostan, B. B.; Çavka, H. B.; Citipitioglu, A. M. and Pehlivan, D. Z. (2026) Retrospective BIM performance analysis based on construction big data. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), pp. 5991-6013. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The literature suggests employing big data and Building Information Modeling (BIM) to examine building projects from several perspectives. Nevertheless, the literature is deficient in thorough BIM performance evaluation methods grounded in big construction project data. This paper presents an evaluation framework outlining the data input requirements and necessary data to conduct research leveraging big data for the analysis of BIM performance. Design/methodology/approach – Data parameters and performance metrics included in the evaluation framework are derived from a synthesis of literature review, data overview and interviews. The construction data was analyzed using PowerBI after undergoing a quality control process. Analysis results were verified through interviews with the main contractor. The project data served to assess the evaluation framework. Findings – The evaluation framework has ten data parameters, and six performance metrics categorized into three main categories. The findings indicate that the evaluation framework can be utilized to comment on BIM performance in a project, with a level of accuracy. Results indicated that ensuring the quality of tracked project data is crucial for obtaining reliable analysis results. Determining performance metrics and data parameters prior to data recording processes can help simplify the analysis process and ensure accurate analysis results. Originality/value – The proposed framework offers a comprehensive performance evaluation methodology that leverages the innovative application of unique and challenging to acquire big data, allowing practitioners to assess BIM performance in relation to project time, cost and scope. Identified data parameters and novel performance metrics may provide the foundation of a guideline for construction project data logging to facilitate accurate BIM performance monitoring.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: big data; BIM performance; BIM performance evaluation; BIM performance metrics; building information modeling
Index terms: accuracy, methodology, interview, performance monitoring, project data, literature review, performance metric, performance analysis, evaluation, construction project, performance evaluation, main contractor, practitioner, quality control, big data, building information modelling
Subjects: practitioner, professional development, production management, information systems, project delivery, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, performance measurement, monitoring and control systems, research methods
Topics: Project Management, Governance, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here